(Не)повторність поезії Емми Андієвської, або Два компаративні ескізи
Завантаження...
Файли
Дата
Автори
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Інститут літератури ім. Т.Г. Шевченка НАН України
Анотація
У статті здійснено спробу окреслити «точки дотику» самобутнього по-тичного письма Е. Андієвської з поезією Емілі Дікінсон (перший ескіз) та Богдана Ігоря Антонича (другий ескіз) — класиків американської та української літератур, у полі впливу яких сформувалася творча особистість мисткині. Компаративний метод у статті не претендує на систем-
ність, однак оприявнює генезу й типологічну подібність таких елементів
ідіостилю Е. Андієвської (з урахуванням їх еволюції в різні періоди творчості), як сюрреалістична метафорика, феноменологічний модус ліричної рефлексії, акустично-асоціативний принцип словесної кореляції, а також
формат репрезентації ліричного суб’єкта і його позиції щодо світу.
Emma Andiievska’s poetic manner is quite experimental in modern literary milieu due to dense metaphoric imagology, daring alliteration, specific subject’s representation, cosmogonic transformation motive, etc., so it hardly correlates wiTheuropean art styles (modernism and postmodernism in particular), albeit her early oeuvre (1950—1960) is being consequently considered as surrealistic one. It is also hard to outline stylistic and mental links between Emma Andiievska’s poetry and Ukrainian or European one since she has been moving in her art creativity strictly towards poetic originality. At the same time, the poetess’ works can’t be excluded from the world literary process — that is the reason for a comparative search. Some literary parallels have been found in Ukrainian (Bohdan Ihor Antonych) and American (Emily Dickinson) poetry. Both authors could influence Emma Andiievska’s poetic manner. There is a similar attitude to reality and own creativity in Emma’s Andiievska’s poetic oeuvre and Emily Dickinson’s one, caused by a desire for solitude and priority of the author’s subjectivity in the lyrical view. There are also some similar syntactic means in the poetics of both female authors. The poetic manner of Emma Andiievska’s works written in the 1950s—1960s also resembles Bohdan Ihor Antonych’s poetical style, represented in his collections “Salute to Life”, “Three Rings” and “The Green Gospel”. The two authors have a similar phenomenological focus of lyrical reflection, surrealistic metaphors, and acoustic mode of connecting words in an utterance. The childlike features of a worldview and oneiric elements of narrative in the literary works realize the surrealistic mode of writing attributable both to Bohdan Ihor Antonych and Emma Andiievska.
Emma Andiievska’s poetic manner is quite experimental in modern literary milieu due to dense metaphoric imagology, daring alliteration, specific subject’s representation, cosmogonic transformation motive, etc., so it hardly correlates wiTheuropean art styles (modernism and postmodernism in particular), albeit her early oeuvre (1950—1960) is being consequently considered as surrealistic one. It is also hard to outline stylistic and mental links between Emma Andiievska’s poetry and Ukrainian or European one since she has been moving in her art creativity strictly towards poetic originality. At the same time, the poetess’ works can’t be excluded from the world literary process — that is the reason for a comparative search. Some literary parallels have been found in Ukrainian (Bohdan Ihor Antonych) and American (Emily Dickinson) poetry. Both authors could influence Emma Andiievska’s poetic manner. There is a similar attitude to reality and own creativity in Emma’s Andiievska’s poetic oeuvre and Emily Dickinson’s one, caused by a desire for solitude and priority of the author’s subjectivity in the lyrical view. There are also some similar syntactic means in the poetics of both female authors. The poetic manner of Emma Andiievska’s works written in the 1950s—1960s also resembles Bohdan Ihor Antonych’s poetical style, represented in his collections “Salute to Life”, “Three Rings” and “The Green Gospel”. The two authors have a similar phenomenological focus of lyrical reflection, surrealistic metaphors, and acoustic mode of connecting words in an utterance. The childlike features of a worldview and oneiric elements of narrative in the literary works realize the surrealistic mode of writing attributable both to Bohdan Ihor Antonych and Emma Andiievska.
Опис
Теми
Діаспора
Цитування
(Не)повторність поезії Емми Андієвської, або Два компаративні ескізи / О. Шаф // Слово і Час. — 2022. — № 1. — С. 38-51. — Бібліогр.: 15 назв. — укp.