Партизаны в Крыму: находки и потери

Abstract

Рецензия на книгу В.Е. Поляков «Партизанское движение в Крыму. 1941–1944 гг.». Организация партизанского движения в Крыму в условиях дефицита времени. Научная новизна исследования. Конфронтация внутри партизанского руководства и ее последствия. Крымскотатарский фактор в действительности и интерпретации историков. Мифологизация партизанского движения в Крыму. Проблемы формы и мотивы коллаборационизма.Рецензія на книгу В.Є. Поляков «Партизанський рух в Криму. 1941–1944 рр.». Організація партизанського руху в Криму в умовах дефіциту часу. Наукова новизна дослідження. Конфронтація всередині партизанського керівництва та її наслідки. Кримськотатарський фактор в дійсності і інтерпретації істориків. Міфологізація партизанського руху в Криму. Проблеми форми і мотиви колабораціонізму.In Crimea, the publishing house "Arial" published scientific monograph docent Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University, Vladimir Polyakov "Partisan movement in Crimea. 1941–1944". In the present review, Professor Dmitry Ursu analyzes the significance of the book and its contribution to the scientific study of the history of the guerrilla movement. The author makes a detailed analysis of known studies on the guerrilla movement and emphasizes the originality and novelty of the scientific work of Vladimir Polyakov. Primarily due to the fact that in addition to attracting the widest range of previously unknown archival material, involved a large circle of narrative documents, including oral memories of participants of events. Vladimir Polyakov managed to approach the study of the organization of the partisan movement in Crimea with new, modern products. First of all, from the standpoint of management. He first showed convincingly that the organization of the guerrilla movement was allocated only one week. The basis of the formation of groups was laid vicious party – nomenclature method. Groups were formed not from the local community, which explains the lack of communication with the public. Caught in the woods military leadership refused to take partisan detachments, and because they were forced to take food by force from the population that gave rise to the conflict partisans – the inhabitants of the mountain villages. First author of the book considered the everyday life of the Crimean guerrillas, including the previously taboo subjects such as the conflict in the leadership of the guerrilla movement. With new products considered objective Crimean aspect in the partisan movement in Crimea. First considered forms and motifs of collaboration. All this is done on the basis of specific examples from the life of the occupied Crimea.